In relation to Ray’s comments about right wing radio and commentary being myopically one-sided, there was a useful interview with Greg Mitchell, editor of Editor and Publisher on Friday’s NOW broadcast devoted to media: coverage of the war, and a very good piece about the mergers of the already giant media conglomerates.  There was good discussion about the risks of embedded reporters over-identifying with their units (using more “we” not “they”) and the adrenalin rush that is normal to all of us in new situations overcoming objectivity. 

 

Detour: If you did not see this, there is a valuable example in the media giant piece about the dangers of no competition in the radio news medium.  As many of you know, Clear Channel Communications owns a lion’s share of broadcast stations around the country and uses pre-taped music shows with localized weather and traffic inserts, so that they sound like they are local even though they are taped somewhere else.  Unfortunately I don’t remember the town and state, but recently, there was a train derailment of toxic chemicals one night and the police tried to call all the local radio stations to alert the public to stay indoors.  There was no one on the air at all of their 5 stations and no one even answered the phone.  They were all owned by CCC and their corporate lean-employee format meant that the shows are running from somewhere else and no one mans the booth.  This became a Homeland Security issue of concern since this resource to alert the public was not available to public law enforcement.  

 

See http://www.pbs.org/now/ NOW with Bill Moyers, who though a “liberal” is an excellent journalist with quality interview and commentary skills.  

 

I have often commented here about the need to retain a balanced menu of news information, accepting that some are more biased than others.  It is becoming a little alarming at how quickly the atmosphere has chilled regarding not just dissent on the subject of war, but detours from the official party line.  

 

For instance, in the Mitchell interview he mentioned that newspaper editors are receiving complaints from readers that they do no want to see photos on the front page of dead Iraqis (referenced Dallas Morning News) and they prefer to see photos of American GI’s walking or assisting Iraqi children on the front pages.  

 

Given the current polling that shows most Americans now support not just the war’s invasion and regime change preemptively, but also aggressive expansion into the Middle East, this can be a chilling reminder of how fast public opinion can be swayed by the information that their own troops in grave danger are succeeding in an expectedly tougher battle but there is victory at hand.  It is also a profound statement about human nature.  

 

I am not going to attempt to compete with the gifted historians and others who have written prolifically about this, but want to note that high peaks in public opinion are always followed by steeper declines.  My sense tells me this is a superficial wave riding the human anxiety factor multiplied by the need to avenge 9/11 and deeply entwined with 1) the urge to feel superior, 2) have a reinvigorated sense of purpose and 3) happy just to be doing something constructive even if it is war, not just normal patriotism.  

 

Unfortunately, there will always be those who glory in blood and guts, and I’m not just referring to military professionals who are glad to do what they were trained to do (and some more than glad).  In our volunteer armed services, the trend over the decades since Nixon ended the draft has been that more of those who choose to serve are of like minds, and thus share the same compunctions about their duties and often the same political worldviews, which makes some of us nervous now with this Pax Americana ideology.  The real tragedy in my opinion are those who join up simply to get the educational benefits and those Reservists/Guards who are banking their retirement, and just want to punch the clock and go home, but never make it. 

 

Americans in particular must keep an eye on the horizon, realizing that winning the military war is just the beginning. 

 

- KWC

 

REH wrote:

Of course it's agitprop.   With so little serious left wing or even middle
of the road agitprop out there this is at least a one voice balance to the
constant agitprop coming from the right in the Media.   "Let he who is
without sin cast the first stone."     Otherwise it's just tit for tat.
Harry, what is it that makes you think that fairness in media is represented
in the political programs on talk radio?   There is so little left wing
agitprop that I find your statement strange.    Might we  have to consider
that what you are saying is agitprop as well?    Even you should admit that
BuzzFlash is a cut above the Drudge Report and it is certainly as satisfying
to me in the middle as Rush is on the right.    I consider Limbaugh to be
embarrassing but not frightening.   Perhaps you feel the same way about
BuzzFlash.   You get rid of right wing radio and I will petition the
Internet to get rid of the two or three non Socialist left wing sites that
offend you.

As for Brian, I think you totally misread him.    He is very middle of the
road in the Canadian Broadcasting Company vein.    When I was up there last,
they were a great deal like William Bennet in reverse.    Since I think
Bennet is a hopeless middleclass mediocrity on the right, I found the CBC a
welcome antidote although containing its own version of provinciality.     I
didn't necessarily agree with them but I was starved for the other side.   I
still am and BuzzFlash is like a combination of their public affairs show
and an old political satire show that existed on TV prior to the dopey
sanitized Saturday Night Live show that replaced it.  close to the show that
I listened to in Canada that summer when I had such a delightful ride across
the country.

American Right Wing Media is anti-intellectual and concerned almost totally
with an impeccible form with a very mediocre content.   Yes I find BuzzFlash
to be a bit like that to,  but frankly the way you have defended right wing
radio, don't you suspect that you deserve it?    Those of us who have been
in the Media are responsible for much of what we have in the present.
Couldn't we show a little dignity and at least admit that this confusion of
reality with art that we are getting from the war these days makes it
possible to accept bombing great cultural monuments and destroying people's
cultural heritage as long as it isn't OUR monuments and heritage.     I
didn't and don't approve of death as entertainment.   I don't see any
difference between the Fox Channels cheers as people die and the murder of
alien nations in the Colisiem.
 

 

Reply via email to