Harry,

Let me respond to only one part of your long and interesting post at this
point and get back to the rest later. The issue I was dealing with was
Blacks who proved to be very competent in graduate school worked at the
same level as did whites who had a couple of hundred extra points on
their GRE which tells me that the GRE is measuring much more than basic
talent and I was more than willing to gamble on taking such Blacks since
they typically were just as good if not better students than the whites.
I would guarantee you nationwide that, through friendships, legacies,
networks, more whites get preferential treatment to universities than do
Blacks. 

BTW, they did a study a number of decades ago to see if White and Black
kids preferred White or Black dentists. The result was that each felt
most comfortable with a dentist of their own ethnic group. When the ran
the same test with Hispanics [remember that this was a number of decades
ago and things, I assume have changed greatly since then], they found
that Hispanics favored the Anglo dentists because they believed that the
'Hispanic' dentists were actually actors since they 'knew' that there was
no such person as a 'Hispanic' dentist.

Bill

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:01:38 -0700 Harry Pollard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bill,
> 
> Some time ago when we had liberal radio talk shows, the surviving 
> dean of 
> talk shows, Michael Jackson (30 years at KABC) was interviewing a 
> black 
> leader. He was a sensible one and the interview was good.
> 
> On the subject of an easier track for blacks, Michael said: "Is it 
> true 
> that if a white mother carried her infant into a hospital and two 
> doctors 
> approached - one black and one white - she would hand her baby to 
> the white 
> doctor?"
> 
> The black guest replied: "If a black mother carried in her baby she 
> would 
> hand it to the white doctor."
> 
> This was the prevailing feeling that if a special deal was made for 
> blacks, 
> we would get rather less than the best in positions that the whites 
> had to 
> sweat for.
> 
> Also, when a token black is brought in politically, it is quite 
> likely that 
> he won't be the best - which will prove to the whites that blacks 
> can't cut it.
> 
> A Georgist friend of mine who worked in the Naval Labs at Vallejo  - 
> north 
> of San Francisco - on his way in from Berkeley would pick up a token 
> black 
> lady every morning - bringing her back at night.
> 
> She had nothing tasks to do and eventually she protested, insisting 
> she 
> should be allowed to work the computers (big corporate types). The 
> executives were in a quandary. They couldn't let her touch the 
> serious 
> stuff, yet she would hit them with "discrimination" if they didn't 
> do 
> something. So, they worked out an unimportant "computer job" for her 
> that 
> kept her quiet.
> 
> Now, if they were offered a black kid computer specialist with good 
> marks 
> from college - they would wonder whether the marks were his, or a 
> bureaucratic contrivance, and would prefer not to hire.
> 
> Most teachers are American liberals and I remember talking to an 
> active 
> type at a junior high school about the bussing of blacks from East 
> Los 
> Angeles to her school in the San Fernando Valley.
> 
> She told me she had never been nervous at school. With the input of 
> black 
> kids, she was actually frightened at times.
> 
> I don't blame the black kids. They had been ripped from their 
> neighborhoods 
> and dropped among white kids, with whom they had little in common. 
> (It is 
> usual in "diversified" schools that during breaks and suchlike, the 
> blacks 
> gather in one place, the Hispanics form their own groups - as do the 
> whites.)
> 
> There is little or none of the diversity so beloved 0f the 
> educational 
> theorists.
> 
> During the bussing there was one part that stood out. This was not 
> compulsory bussing but voluntary bussing. The parents were part of 
> the 
> system and made sure their kids were dropped off and picked up after 
> 
> school. They supported their kids and the schools they went to.
> 
> This was successful.
> 
> So bussing was cut. The union, whose main focus is not to teach 
> children, 
> but to get higher pay for less work, made sure that the successful 
> voluntary bussing was the first to go.
> 
> The educational system seems to be in the business of warehousing 
> kids 
> rather than teaching them. Ending compulsory education would be a 
> way of 
> reaching excellence in teaching. The stock answer (from the unions) 
> to that 
> suggestion is that kids wouldn't come to school. They would cause 
> trouble 
> out on the streets.
> 
> So it is confirmed that the schools are a way of baby sitting 
> potential 
> offenders. But putting kids who could care less in classrooms 
> diminishes 
> the attention that can be paid to students who want to learn. I have 
> seen 
> various figures, but it seems that often a quarter of a teachers 
> time is 
> spent on discipline.
> 
> Some schools segregate the delinquents and waste the time of a good 
> teacher 
> baby sitting them.
> 
> I was walking the corridors of an Orange County school with a 
> teacher 
> friend who had been assigned the "H Group". We met the Principal who 
> said: 
> "Janet, you are doing a great job with the H Group."
> 
> Janet said: "He's never been near the class. What he means is that 
> there's 
> been no trouble from them. That means a I've done a great job."
> 
> More teacher time is spent on trying to get the recalcitrants to do 
> their 
> assignments. Teachers have told me they would fail 75% of their 
> classes if 
> they could, but this doesn't look good for their careers. Also, 
> pressure 
> comes from above to pass them anyway. The Principal doesn't look 
> good if a 
> large percentage of his students are failing.
> 
> A friend of mine has stopped pursuing his PhD and is teaching at 
> junior 
> college. His students would mostly fail so he asked the Principal 
> what to 
> do. The Principal told him how to produce more successes - marking 
> on 
> attempts rather than performance.
> 
> So, if we end compulsion we'll get fewer black kids into grade and 
> high 
> schools, but the ones who are there will want to learn and they will 
> have 
> the backing of their parents.
> 
> That's the way to get good black kids on the ladder to success.
> 
> (Incidentally, I would suspect that most black kids would go to 
> school 
> anyway, because their parents would insist. So, if the teacher said 
> 'he's 
> not working, so I'm dropping him' - the parents had better do 
> something or 
> he'll be their responsibility.)
> 
> Harry
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> 
> Bill wrote:
> 
> >Harry,
> >
> >I agree we need a fair playing field. I have found that accepting 
> an
> >African American into grad school with a GRE score 200 points lower
> >predicts equal quality once in school. One school I taught at 
> always had
> >the files of legacies [not many Blacks, Native Americans, nor 
> Hispanics
> >there] marked so that admissions committees wouldn't forget.
> >
> >How would you like to have Dr. Bakke be your friendly physician?
> >
> >Bill
> 
> 
> ****************************************************
> Harry Pollard
> Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles
> Box 655   Tujunga   CA   91042
> Tel: (818) 352-4141  --  Fax: (818) 353-2242
> http://home.attbi.com/~haledward
> ****************************************************
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to