What terrific citizens.   Just the kind of people I would like to live next
door or marry my daughter.

REH


----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 9:03 AM
Subject: RE: [Futurework] the "Cost Efficiency" of Deregulation


> As I read the article it seemed to say " boys, if we want this game to
> continue, there has to be some rules. With no rules the game threatens to
> implode.  So,let the government make the rules so we can go on making
money.
> Later on we can continue carping about too much government this and too
much
> government that.  Meanwhile we can rake it in."
>
> arthur
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Evans Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:58 PM
> To: Brad McCormick, Ed.D.; Christoph Reuss
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] the "Cost Efficiency" of Deregulation
>
>
> Brad,
> I cited the front page article in today's W$J that
> > said markets need to be regulated -- not to get rid
> > of them (as leftists would like...), but to
> > prevent them from self-destructing (enlightened
> > conservatism...).
>
>
> It is a schuzzy thing that the right always tells the left about what it
> believes.   During the cold war those same neo-cons were a part of the
> Congress for Cultural Freedom that pushed non-Communist Socialism (that
was
> a mixed economy) in Europe as an alternative to Communist Socialism.
> Europe bought it and now has the best standard of overall living in the
> world as well as the best cultural and the best social programs.   But
here
> we get "compassionate conservatives" who believe in "re-regulation"?
> You've got to be kidding.   What do they smoke out there in those upper
> class communities?
>
> REH
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brad McCormick, Ed.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Christoph Reuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] the "Cost Efficiency" of Deregulation
>
>
> > Christoph Reuss wrote:
> > >     Cost of fixing the dilapidated U$ power grid:  $100 Billion.
> > > Cost of NOT fixing the dilapidated U$ power grid:  $100 Billion PER
> YEAR.
> > >
> > > So why hasn't it been fixed/upgraded long ago?  Deregulation...
> >
> > To quote Paul Krugman:
> >
> >     faith-based deregulation
> >
> > I cited the front page article in today's W$J that
> > said markets need to be regulated -- not to get rid
> > of them (as leftists would like...), but to
> > prevent them from self-destructing (enlightened
> > conservatism...).
> >
> > \brad mccormick
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030825/us_nm/power_black
> out_transmission_dc_5
> > >
> > >
> > > Power Grid Upgrade to Cost Customers $100 Billion
> > >
> > >    Mon Aug 25, 3:20 PM ET
> > >    By Chris Baltimore
> > >
> > > WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. consumers would have to foot a
> > > $100 billion bill to upgrade the nation's rickety electric
transmission
> > > grid but could reap five-fold savings from cheaper power costs,
> > > according to an industry report released on Monday.
> > >
> > > The Electric Power Research Institute, a utility-funded group
> > > based in Palo Alto, California, said sizable investment is needed
> > > to prevent a repeat of the massive Aug. 14 blackout which left
> > > more than 50 million people without power and exposed the
> > > dilapidated state of the nation's power grid.
> > >
> > > The root of the problem is longtime institutional neglect of the
> nation's
> > > transmission grid, which could only be reversed by hefty spending, the
> > > group said. The $100 billion price tag to fix the problem is "the best
> > > estimate that we can do at present," said Stephen Gehl, director of
> > > strategic technology for the group. "It's an approximate number -- we
> > > would be the first to say that."
> > >
> > > "The pressures of cost containment have essentially stifled and
> > > deferred needed infrastructure investment in the electricity sector
for
> at
> > > least two decades," the report said. It said the investment deficit is
> now
> > > running at about $20 billion a year.
> > >
> > > The Edison Electric Institute, the biggest U.S. utility lobbying
group,
> > > has pegged the cost of needed long-distance transmission projects at
> > > $56 billion over the next nine years, not including local distribution
> > > projects.
> > >
> > > Long-haul transmission lines transport high-voltage electricity from
> > > generation plants to central hubs, where it is funneled through local
> > > utilities' distribution networks to homes and businesses at a lower
> > > voltage.
> > >
> > > Transmission projects have suffered at the same time as companies
> > > have invested in new power generating plants.
> > >
> > > While the cost of upgrading transmission lines would be large, the
> > > potential payoff would be huge, the industry group said. Power grid
> > > bottlenecks and system glitches cost the U.S. economy an estimated
> > > $100 billion a year -- 1 percent of total U.S. gross domestic product,
> it
> > > said.
> > >
> > > The average U.S. consumer would see annual power bills rise by less
> > > than $100 to pay for new transmission projects but would save $500 a
> > > year from lower power costs, the group said.
> > >
> > > Activist groups said consumers shouldn't be stuck paying the bill.
> > >
> > > Mark Cooper, an economist at the Consumer Federation of America,
> > > said the upgrades would be a raw deal for ratepayers, saying billions
> > > of dollars in hidden costs were needed to finance new grid projects.
> > >
> > > "The billion dollar benefits don't materialize tomorrow," Cooper said.
> > > "If you match the stream of costs to the stream of benefits, this is a
> > > terrible deal for the American consumer."
> > >
> > > The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (news - web sites)
> > > (FERC), which has proposed rules to boost incentives for utilities
that
> > > build new transmission capacity, said consumers would clearly
> > > benefit.
> > >
> > > Transmission accounts for only 10 percent of a consumer's power bill,
> > > but new grid projects could return rewards far greater than their
cost,
> > > FERC spokesman Bryan Lee said.
> > >
> > > "We're confident these improvements will eliminate bottlenecks,
> > > improve grid access and help reduce the commodity cost of the
> > > delivered bill," Lee said.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Futurework mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >    Let your light so shine before men,
> >                that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)
> >
> >    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)
> >
> > <![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >    Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Futurework mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to