Sounds like Forbes would think he had died and gone to paradise.
 
REH
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] We're getting the hell out

Quranically, there is to be a 2.5% tax on all assets annually [zakat].
 
Bill
 
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 10:58:51 -0500 "Ray Evans Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
With the exception of the military, roads and education what do they tax for in Islamic countries?     Here in the US we have a very complicated system that upholds the culture.   The flat tax would reduce support to many activities that are uniquely Western in culture and not related to Islamic values.   So now we know that Norquist, Graham, Armey, Kemp and Forbes are Moslems?    Or that they have enough money to do what they want and screw the little guy that needs the government to make things available for his children that give him equality in the possibilities Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. 
 
REH
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Futurework] We're getting the hell out

Repeating what other colonial powers have done in times past, instituting policies or systems not possible to do on the home front, the US imposes a flat tax on Iraq that might be the equivalent of a Superbowl ad: great marketing for a huge audience.  KWC

 

U.S. Administrator Imposes Flat Tax System on Iraq

By Dana Milbank and Walter Pincus, Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 2, 2003; Page A09 @ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50031-2003Nov1.html

The flat tax, long a dream of economic conservatives, is finally getting its day -- not in the United States, but in Iraq.

It took L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator in Baghdad, no more than a stroke of the pen Sept. 15 to accomplish what eluded the likes of publisher Steve Forbes, Reps. Jack Kemp (R-N.Y.) and Richard K. Armey (R-Tex.), and Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Tex.) over the course of a decade and two presidential campaigns.

"The highest individual and corporate income tax rates for 2004 and subsequent years shall not exceed 15 percent," Bremer wrote in Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 37, "Tax Strategy for 2003," issued last month.

Voilą! Iraq has a flat tax, and the 15 percent rate is even lower than Forbes (17 percent) and Gramm (16 percent) favored for the United States. And, unless a future Iraqi government rescinds it, the flat tax will remain long after the Americans have left.

"It's extremely good news," said Grover Norquist, head of Americans for Tax Reform and a Bush administration ally. Bremer's vaguely worded edict leaves open the possibility that Iraqis could face different levels of taxation below 15 percent, but "they told me it's a flat rate and it appears as though it's a flat rate," Norquist said. The tax fighter added: "It might be a hint to the rest of us."

Bremer's new economic policy for Iraq will slash Saddam Hussein's top tax rate for individuals and businesses from 45 to 15 percent. Of course, since Hussein's government, like others in the Middle East, almost never enforced tax collection, there is no real history of paying taxes in the country.

 

Bremer's statement in the following excerpt from Joel Brinkley's piece in today's NYT is coded language for:

"We're getting the hell out of here. Our soldiers are at the point of mutiny. Americans are going to turn aginst Bush with vengeance quite soon unless we leave. We'll concoct a Constitution and fling it at the Iraqis and let them get on with it. Never mind that Saddam Hussein has not been caught. Never mind that the Constitution will not resolve the problem of the relationship between the Sunnis and the Shias, nor that between the Kurds and Turkey. We're getting out because Bush won't have a snowflake in hell's chance of re-election if this goes on for much longer."

When the Americans get out of Iraq by the spring there'll very likely be a bloodbath and either the Sunnis + Saddam's Fedayeen will win or the Shias will win. It's as simple and messy as that unless -- and it's very big unless -- the Iranians invade Iraq and occupy the southern part of the country in order to protect the Shias.

As far as the American energy situation is concerned, the country will be back to where they were a year ago, having to rely on Saudi Arabia as their main Middle East oil sujppliers. And SA is just about the most unstable country in the world right now. (See my posting of the interview with Prince Turki from this week-end's Financial Times Magazine.)

Keith Hudson

<<<<
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Nov. 1 -- Almost every sector of life in Baghdad was off kilter on Saturday, usually a normal business day here, because of anonymous warnings that hospitals, schools and other unspecified sites would be the targets of bombings.

Residents kept their children home from school. The United States military kept most soldiers in their barracks, and shopkeepers complained that they had no business.

After one of the worst weeks of violence here in months, L. Paul Bremer III, the special representative for Iraq, said the American strategy for quelling the attacks was to "encourage Iraqis to play a central role" in securing the nation.
>>>>


Keith Hudson, Bath, England, <www.evolutionary-economics.org>, <www.handlo.com>, <www.property-portraits.co.uk>
 

Reply via email to