I love my urban sinkhole.

REH


----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 9:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Private health care (was E.European...)


> But aren't the "urban sinkholes" part of the US?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harry Pollard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 6:14 PM
> To: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Futurework] Private health care (was E.European...)
>
>
> Arthur,
>
> I was going to write that if you remove the urban sinkholes from
> the equation, the US statistics would look better - then I
> remembered Gwen's introduction to Canada.
>
> They landed at the City of Quebec and took the train down to
> Toronto. She expressed amazement that the train was cleared along
> the way so it could be cleaned (maybe back then British trains
> weren't so often cleaned).
>
> But the City of Quebec concerned her most as the train traveled
> past a forest of tar paper shacks. She wondered what kind of
> country she had come to where people lived the winter in such
> poor accommodation.
>
> So, Canada may (still?) have her problems, but surely not to the
> degree of the US.
>
> Harry
>
>
> ********************************************
> Henry George School of Social Science
> of Los Angeles
> Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
> Tel: 818 352-4141  --  Fax: 818 353-2242
> http://haledward.home.comcast.net
> ********************************************
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Futurework] Private health care (was E.European...)
>
> To add to the discussion.
>
> This from the Wall Street Journal (Nov. 12, 03), citing an OECD
> document.
>
> The US spends more on health as a percentage of GDP
>
> (2.7 percent in US vs. 2.1 percent in Canada)
>
> and has more doctors,
>
> (2.7 practicing physicians per 1000 people in the US vs. 2.1 in
> Canada)
>
> Yet lives are shorter
>
> (76.8 years in the US vs 79.4 in Canada)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harry Pollard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 3:38 AM
> To: 'Brad McCormick, Ed.D.'; 'pete'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Futurework] Private health care (was E.European...)
>
>
> Brad,
>
> I've already told you that you are too good to be anxious about
> small things.
>
> At the end of 20 years, your doctor will probably retire, so you
> will have to get used to another.
>
> Groups of doctors are better than single doctors, for they can
> fill in for each other. There's always a doctor there when you
> need him.
>
> The difference between entities such as Kaiser and (say) the
> Canadian National Health Service, is that Kaiser has to compete.
> If standards go down they will lose members to a competing
> service.
>
> Standards have apparently dropped in the UK even though they
> continue to pour money into it.
>
> You can choose a private doctor and I understand a lot do, but
> when the doctor feels you need hospital, you go into a NHS
> hospital (if you can get in).
>
> Harry
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.541 / Virus Database: 335 - Release Date: 11/14/2003
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to