Good
point, Arthur.
What I
have never understood, though, is this thing of breathing in AND out. I
mean, wouldn't that just cancel everything out? Like, why bother? Well,
OK, some argue that we do need oxygen. I can accept that, at least in
theory. But then why not just breathe in? You know, do half the work, and
therefore live twice as long. Seems to me that that would make lots of
sense.
Cheers,
Lawry
|
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem of s... Harry Pollard
- Re: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem of same-s... wbward
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem of s... Harry Pollard
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem ... Lawrence DeBivort
- Re: [Futurework] Bush's impossible prob... Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] Bush's impossible ... Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: [Futurework] Bush's imposs... Ed Weick
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's im... Harry Pollard
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible ... Harry Pollard
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem of same-s... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem of s... Lawrence DeBivort
- Re: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem ... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem ... Keith Hudson
- Re: [Futurework] Bush's impossible prob... Ray Evans Harrell
- Breathing in/out (wasRe: [Futurewor... Keith Hudson
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem of same-s... Christoph Reuss
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem of same-s... Christoph Reuss
- RE: [Futurework] Bush's impossible problem of s... Lawrence DeBivort