Ray,
I was obviously kidding.
Or, not so obvious, for off you went into a psychological analysis of me,
of which endeavor I'm not sure you are completely competent.
I did meet you on your turf - but you weren't there.
Harry
********************************************
Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 Tel: 818 352-4141 -- Fax: 818 353-2242 http://haledward.home.comcast.net ******************************************** From: Ray Evans Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:30 PM To: Harry Pollard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricardo, Cavema n Trade vs. Modern Trade Harry said again:
What they work for
is food, clothing and shelter. When the basics are dealt with, perhaps then
they'll devote some time to the arts - such as Michael Jackson, Madonna,
and of course, Britney Spears.
Answer:
That's not the arts that's
entertainment. Re-read the fifty assumptions. The basic
arts is what made you suck in the first place. Entertainment is
relaxation in the traditional and predictable. The arts are
always on the same cutting edge as when you first searched for the nipple at
your mother's breast. Searching, finding, fulfillment.
Consonance, dissonance in quantifiable aural forms that develop the mind and
enrich the whole person's thinking. You are still talking pablum
while I am talking steak. The problem Harry is that you model is
based only on economics when the meaning of existance is a mix and balance of
values not just the values of one limb on the tree at the expense of the
roots.
You'll have to get beyond
mere relaxation before you understand the human meaning imbedded in the
arts. If I were to compare it to math I would say that you are
talking addition to a physicist. There are some things that just
can't be explained without a meeting of the minds. If you
worked as hard to meet me on my turf as I have worked to do the same for you
then we could do a lot. I know we could.
REH
--- |
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ri... Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Harry Pollard
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ri... Harry Pollard
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ri... Harry Pollard
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ri... Cordell . Arthur
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Harry Pollard
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ri... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Harry Pollard
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ri... Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Harry Pollard
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework]... Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ri... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework]... Harry Pollard
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Harry Pollard