On 12/29/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:42:16PM +0000, seventh guardian wrote: > > OOPS it's not safe yet. There's a segmentation fault right in the > beggining..... I'll try to find it.For such a dangerous change it would be good if you could split the diffs into a series of self-contained patches that add/change some of the functionality. It would help to proof read the changes.
You're right. First, we are not dealing with module numbers, but pointers to a type fmodule. So execcontext.c/h needed changing. Here's the patch. More to follow.. Renato
execcontext.patch
Description: Binary data
