On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 09:55:31PM +0000, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 12/29/06, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 12/29/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:42:16PM +0000, seventh guardian wrote:
> >> >
> >> > OOPS it's not safe yet. There's a segmentation fault right in the
> >> > beggining..... I'll try to find it.
> >>
> >> For such a dangerous change it would be good if you could split
> >> the diffs into a series of self-contained patches that add/change
> >> some of the functionality.  It would help to proof read the
> >> changes.
> >
> >You're right.
> >
> >First, we are not dealing with module numbers, but pointers to a type
> >fmodule. So execcontext.c/h needed changing. Here's the patch.
> 
> Now that we have the context dealing mechanism ready, it's time to
> change the module_interface header, replacing all the arrays by the
> linked list, and all "int module" by "fmodule *module".
> 
> Note that I've also created a helper function (countModules) to count
> the modules in the list. For now it is useful for debug.
> 
> Patch to module_interface.h on annex..

Looks good.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

 --
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to