On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:46:55PM -0700, Jason Weber wrote: > > I'll leave CPP and M4 for now as I'd like to try something with them. > > Is there something we're supposed to be using to replace FvwmM4?
No. > Also, I am quietly watching to make sure you don't mention any module > I am critically dependent on. We are still out here even when we're silent. > If you are about to remove something or make a substantial change, > just make sure to use an appropriately provocative subject line. I've been more than conservative in my decisions, so I don't think there's too much to worry about there. > I still have FvwmWinList on a button in case I get some rogue window > that FvwmProxy doesn't represent, but, honestly, it isn't a big deal. I'd consider that a bug in FvwmProxy, in which case, please fix it. FvwmWinList is going the way of the Dodo... -- Thomas Adam