On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:46:55PM -0700, Jason Weber wrote:
> > I'll leave CPP and M4 for now as I'd like to try something with them.
> 
> Is there something we're supposed to be using to replace FvwmM4?

No.

> Also, I am quietly watching to make sure you don't mention any module
> I am critically dependent on.  We are still out here even when we're silent.
> If you are about to remove something or make a substantial change,
> just make sure to use an appropriately provocative subject line.

I've been more than conservative in my decisions, so I don't think there's too
much to worry about there.

> I still have FvwmWinList on a button in case I get some rogue window
> that FvwmProxy doesn't represent, but, honestly, it isn't a big deal.

I'd consider that a bug in FvwmProxy, in which case, please fix it.
FvwmWinList is going the way of the Dodo...

-- Thomas Adam

Reply via email to