On 01 Sep 2005 22:40:06 +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: > > I don't really see a need to try to reimplement the entire placement feel > with keybindings. As soon as I start looking at modifiers and/or keys I > would need a mush more complex binding system then the one I'e > been looking to implement, to just change the mouse placement logic. To do > something more than the control of buttons useanle for placement/cancel > would require me to learn the current fvwm code more and fully understand > how the true bindings work. It is possible that I'll be looking into that > next summer, but it's nothing I'm goig to do now.
Well, we are not really in any particular hurry about this functionality. The idea to have configurable bindings for everything may be certainly explored after 2.6, if anyone is interested. Keep up your contributions. Regarding your PlacedByButton3 enhancements, I don't personally use this feature. I think your patch is reasonable, expecially the man page part, but I prefer to hear the Dominik opinion on whether to apply it and when. P.S. I think you should use one bit for placed_by_button flag and "unsigned char" instead of "int" in the windows structures. Let's keep the fvwm memory usage minimal when possible. Regards, Mikhael.