I have been thinking about the plans for the next release and about the long way we had to go for 2.4. Dan is absolutely right when he wants to find a way to establish a shorter release cycle. 2.4 took to much time and I doubt I have the endurace for such an herculean effort again. There are a *lot* of things that were postponed until after 2.4 that could be done now. All the small enhancement requests and bug fixes alone may justify another release.
I believe 2.4 got out of hand because we tried to do everything at once at first and then there were too many dependencies in the code to be resolved so that we could not release although we wanted to. It may be better to plan for a 2.6 release that comes up with many small enhancements, bug fixes and maybe even some of the bigger but less disruptive features. A new stable release within half of a year semms to be a good plan to me. What do you think? Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
