On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:59:11AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > I want to add an option to interactive Move, so snap is ignored. > > What do you think is a preferable syntax approach? > I may think about 2 possible solutions. > > 1) New command UnconstrainedMove with the same arguments as Move. > 2) An option to Move and AnimatedMove (other *Move* commands are not > interactive) called NoSnap.
Why? What is the advantage to turning SnapAttraction off before moving and enabling it afterwards? Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20 -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
