On 24 May 2002 19:30:26 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:15:28AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > > > > And I think what we need is this: > > > > > > shadow=<size>[,<direction>] > > > > Yes, I am agree. One point is that I do not think that we need > > distincts x and y (Dan?). > > > > > I don't know whether specifying more than 1 direction (more than 1 bit) > > > looks good, say 3 directions [n, ne, e] are encoded by 2+4+8=14. > > > > > > But I know that a shadow _around_ text should look nice: > > > > > > shadow=1,255 > > > > > > This draws a shadow 8 times, one in each direction. Just an idea. > > > > Yes agree again. But do you think that the user will like to give > > the directions with a number? > > So the syntax may be: > > > > shadow=<size> [directions] > > > > where directions is a space separated list constituted by se (default), s, > > n, o, e, so, ne, no and all. Or maybe we can use "iconbox" directions > > bl, b, t, l, r, br, tr, tl. > > Lets see, a 1 pixel shadow on the upper right would be: > > Font "shadow=1,ur:9x15bold" > > A 2 pixed shadow all around the character would be: > > Font "shadow=2,l r t b ur ul lr ll:9x15bold"
Just to make it sure we all agree. I think comma to separate size and direction is better than space. A space or a plus may separate directions. I think the "all" name is ok. I am not sure before seeing it we really need more than 1 direction word. If this looks ugly (t+bl) we may restrict the direction part to one word. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
