On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 07:28:27 -0400
Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Woodside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > 2) My original intent was to tell him that in the comparison
> > chart he should check FVWM as having pinnable
> > (or tear-off) menus (which, ahem, would make
> > FVWM the only WM with *all* the columns checked).
> > But I can't recall whether tear-off menus are in 2.4. Are they?
>
> They are not in 2.4.
That's what I thought.
> There are problems with the way they work and they
> will probably be disabled in 2.6. There was some discussion of
> the problems a few months ago.
Bummer! It's a nice feature that I like to use occasionally, and
haven't seen a problem (but maybe I haven't triggered it, or it just
doesn't bother me). Guess I'll have to search the archives to see what
the problem(s) might be.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
