On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:07:37PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: [snip] > > > Of course Dan can speak for himself, but according to the mail > > > archive he did neither vote for nor against the patch. Not that I > > > think it matters. > > > > In general Dan does not vote. He gives arguments. At the end there is > > no arguments against. But yes it is possible that Dan use abstention. > > I agree with Dominik, my vote hardly matters.
I didn't say your vote hardly matters. I said the difference between abstaining and voting for the patch hardly matters in this specific situation since most people seem to be mad about committing the patch anyway. > As I said before, I think votes should be in proportion to > contribution. Really, I think once voting has become arguing it isn't worth the effort anymore. The idea was to reach a consensus while in feature freenze or even code freeze. But this requires talking with each other. We have not done this in a long time, and frankly, because of the events around the licensing argument, I can not stand to talk with some of the people here anymore. All that still can happen in this thread is to alienate me even further from the project. Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
