Chris Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dan Espen wrote: > > > > Didn't you say the Sol 9/10 header would work on Sol 8. > > Why not make the header required. If someone wants Xinerama > > on Sol 8, make them supply the header. > > It does, but it seems like having the xinerama support enabled > with no user effort for Solaris 8 users would be worth having. > You don't need to be an admin, or even very smart, to build > a window manager. Making sure you can put an extension somewhere > and have auto-conf'd programs find them requires more of the > user. > > It only requires putting 4 lines in FScreen.c. One #def, > and three prototypes. Actually, we're only using two of the > functions, so we could take out the other prototype.
If the #define'd stuff is only used on Solaris, when the header isn't there, and the library support is there, I'd say that was OK. -- Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
