On 2/11/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:37:51PM +0000, seventh guardian wrote: > > On 2/10/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:03:09PM +0000, seventh guardian wrote: > > > > I happende to step on this when I was trying the wiki: > > > > > > > > DV> What about the future? Well, the work for the next stable series > > > > DV> (2.6.x) is proceeding very well. Fvwm will go into feature freeze > > > > DV> again near the end of the year so that 2.6 is ready before fvwm's > > > > DV> tenth birthday on 1st of June, 2003. I have vague plans for a > > > > DV> big event on that day to remind people that fvwm is still there > > > > DV> and that it can easily compete with any other window manager. > > > > DV> After that there are plans for a version 3.0 that would change a > > > > DV> lot of the syntax and introduce fantastic new features, but that's > > > > DV> too far from now. > > > > > > > > It has been a long time, and there are no major bugs now. Can we > > > > proceed to the next level? > > > > > > It's just a matter of doing the tedious work, and it looks like > > > nobody has the time to do it right now. We have a todo-2.6 that > > > lists all the open issues, but that is several years old and needs > > > updating. > > > > > > > Here goes the 3rd patch (maybe the last), for the work I've done until > > yesterday. I will put this project on hold now, and see if I can help > > bringing 2.6 to life. > > Applied. Please try to list *every* function changed. I know it > has become a custom to omit that lately (especially under > modules/), but it has often saved me lots of work. > > I've even added a ChangeLog script for vim to the utils/ > directory, so there is no excuse not to do this for vim, emacs and > xemacs users.
What about nano users? I'll try not to be so lazy about that. In the meanwhile I'll try to find a way to implement that in nano. If any of you have an idea on how to do that please say so.. Thanks. Cheers, Renato Caldas
