Hi Dominik, > That's just one purpose of the command. I was always fond of the > idea to prototype or even implement modules as shell scripts.
Yes, that would be cool. IMHO, I think it would be prudent to create "bashlib" (akin to perllib), instead of adding ModuleListenOnly command. But I suppose that should be a 2.6 feature? > It is certainly possible to handle input > from fvwm to the module in the script itself, but hard to > guarantee that the input is processed in a timely fashion Why is that? Re: grabbing and complex functions. I'll reply to this in a new thread with a more appropriate subject. SCoTT. :)
