The last time I tried to use this 'Litestep' on NT machine, which I believe it was sometime around 2002/3, its functionality was not even close to the level of fvwm. I used it for a while because it was the only virtual desktop I could find for Windows and still I had to dump it because it was less capable and less configurable than fvwm in the area of virtual desktop and pager.
It seems to me that this is a typical Microsoft approach of re-writing already existing technology to less capability to call it original. On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:29:20 +0100 Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> An article on arstechinca specifically mentioning FvwmPager and |> Enlightenment: |> |> http://arstechnica.com/news/posts/1077781268.html |> |> Ciao |> |> Dominik ^_^ ^_^ |> -- |> Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. |> To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a |> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Toshi Isogai [EMAIL PROTECTED] SEAKR Engineering, Inc. 6221 S. Racine Circle Centennial, CO 80111 Phone (303) 784-7674 direct (303) 790-8499 main -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
