On 01 Mar 2003 11:30:03 -0800, Tenebrae wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > On 01 Mar 2003 16:20:23 +0530, Kingsly John wrote: > > > > > > +++ Michael Fischer [2003-02-28 20:37:02]: > > > > > > > What I want is a 1 column, 4 row FvwmButtons, where > > > > (counting from top to bottom), the sizes are > > > > > > > > 68x68 > > > > 68x68 > > > > 68x252 > > > > 68x68 > > > > > > I think Fvwm requires all the buttons to be in some kind of ratio. > > > (ie,252 is not a multiple of 68) > > > > Nothing like this is required. It is only that if it is a multiple of 68 > > all proportions may be reduced to 1x1 and so on, but this is optional. > > The above may be reduced as well: 17x17, 17x63. > > > > I suggest to use ButtonGeometry to specify the exact size of 1x1 button. > > For example try: > > > > *FvwmButtons: ButtonGeometry 4x4-0+0 > > *FvwmButtons: (17x17, ...) > > *FvwmButtons: (17x63, ...) > > Ohhhh...so he could specify the geometry like: > > *FvwmButtons: ButtonGeometry 68x68-0+0 > > ...and then for the larger button, he could put: > > *MailBox: (1x4, Swallow(UseOld,NoHints,Respawn) "gkrellm" \ > `Exec exec gkrellm`) > > ...and get rid of the other 68x68 geometry calls and it'll probably do > what he wants? Well, it'd be 68x272 instead of 252, but...close enough > for government work?
I am not sure whether this is a rhetorical question or not. Yes, it would be close enough to the Michael's needs. My example above gives the exact sizes. As well as the following: *FvwmButtons: ButtonGeometry 1x1-0+0 *FvwmButtons: Columns 68 # it is vertical *FvwmButtons: (68x68, ...) *FvwmButtons: (68x252, ...) Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
