>>> On 8/30/2007 at 7:59 AM, Sergio Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Crist, > > Is not how you "name" the interfaces, I believe what Hugo is talking about > is the fact that interfaces with secondary IPs is something not supported to > be used as Licensed Interfaces. Which seems to be the case when you have > something like bge0:1, instead of just bge0.
But bge0:1 or bge<n>:<m> is all I'll ever have in a non-global zone in Solaris (AFAIK). So I guess that you can't run SmartCenter in a non-global zone in Solaris? That's just silly. Reason number 1378 why Check Point's draconian licensing scheme hurts its legitimate customers. I'm just waiting for my VAR to get a response from Check Point to get Check Point's stance this. I am not optimistic. In the mean time, I have the SmartCenter running in the global zone with the IP address on bge0 while I work through the other procedures for my upgrade. But I don't want to have to deploy that way. > Something I just thought about is maybe this 206.220.x.x address is assigned > to a secondary NIC on your SmartCenter. If you SMC has more than one NIC and > maybe another one has the IP that identifies the object you have in the GUI, > you might get a problem. > > If that is the case, just go to the UserCenter and change the IP of your > licenses to match the IP you have on the SMC object. > > Regards > > On 8/28/07, Hugo van der Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, cisco4ng wrote: >> >> > I know for a fact that the P-1 MDG R65 has an issue with applying >> > CMA license via the MDG. Checkpoint is aware of this because >> > I opened a TAC case on this and they gave me a new MDG to fix >> > this. >> > >> > As far as the bge0:1 is concerns, I did try this with NGx R61 >> > and it worked for me. CP must have changed this in NGx R65 >> >> Great. Try 20 versions and see how many times it works. Try 10 engineers >> and ask them it if is supported. >> >> Bot tscores are closer to 0 then 100% in my experience. >> >> So our company states it is not support and we do not sort out this sort >> of shit. We want stable networks and stable firewalls. B¼information contained in this e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================================================= To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the BODY of the email add: set fw-1-mailinglist nomail ================================================= To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================= If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] =================================================
