Thanks, however the cluster members are on the same 10.x so if I change these 
then the topo is not correct, that is why I thought I'd create a dummy for the 
cluster members interface 20.x.2 and  20.x.3 alternatively have the members on 
a different interface?

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:19 BST Stephen JT Bourike wrote:

>Hi Peter,
>
>You do NOT need to make any entries to the topology details of the cluster - 
>this ONLY contains real, physical IP addresses for real physical interfaces.
>
>You must edit the CLUSTER MEMBER addresses for the two gateways in the 
>cluster, and change these addresses to be the 20.20.20.x addresses that the 
>management server sees the cluster machines on.
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>Steve
>Mob:   +44 7766 704871
>
>Security is a process, not a product.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Addy
>Sent: 22 June 2011 15:35
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Please help!!! " Reason: Smart Center Server aborted 
>connection with peer, due to timeout = 300000( mili-sec )( port = 18191 )
>
>hey i wish i held the purse strings, then you would be in for a quick fix :)
>
>Appreciate all your help, i have changed the main ip back to the 10 and will 
>simply add two interfaces no cluster for the 20.x, will need to update the 
>cert now the main ip has changed
>
>thanks and i may just call if i get stuck :)
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Stephen JT Bourike <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Wed, 22 June, 2011 14:50:33
>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Please help!!! " Reason: Smart Center Server aborted 
>connection with peer, due to timeout = 300000( mili-sec )( port = 18191 )
>
>Peter,
>
>You should NOT need to change the GENERAL address of the cluster at all, only 
>the IP addresses of each member defined in the CLISTER MEMBERS section.
>
>You may define the IP address used by the cluster for VPN activity in the VPN 
>section of the gateway object, it is simply the default that the general 
>(main) address is used.
>
>Read my last response carefully, and take it step by step  - Or call me and 
>I'll come and do it for you for a reasonable consideration :)
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>Steve
>Security is a process, not a product.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Addy
>Sent: 22 June 2011 14:36
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Please help!!! " Reason: Smart Center Server aborted 
>connection with peer, due to timeout = 300000( mili-sec )( port = 18191 )
>
>Stephen,
>
>Thanks, i think now you have opened up another can of worms :)
>
>basically there is a vpn, and the current main ip of the cluster is 
>10.10.10.1, if i change this to the 20.20.20.1 then the vpn will no longer 
>cease to work im i'm i right?
>
>the main ip has to be on the same address as the cluster members, so if this is
>10.10.10.2 and 3, then the main ip has to be on the same range?
>
>if this was purely manangment of the firewalls then the change to 20.20.20.1 i 
>reckon would be fine, but the vpn is currently to the main ip 10.10.10.1 so i 
>guess this would have to remain the same, anyway around this or is it simply a 
>no go??
>
>thanks and sorry to keep bombarding you mail
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Stephen JT Bourike <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Wed, 22 June, 2011 13:04:10
>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Please help!!! " Reason: Smart Center Server aborted 
>connection with peer, due to timeout = 300000( mili-sec )( port = 18191 )
>
>This is all getting overly complex, and the real answer may be to simply 
>re-locate the new smartcenter to a location that allows it to manage the 
>firewalls WITHOUT NAT, and only worry about NAT'ing the GUI client connections 
>to the management server device (if that is necessary).
>
>Nonetheless, the topology tab controls the physical addressing of the cluster 
>and any virtual (clustered) addresses.  The GENERAL tab has an IP address that 
>the management server will connect to in order to control the gateways.  This 
>DOES NOT have to be the address of the cluster nearest to the management 
>server (some caveats, see below), it can be ANY physical address present on 
>the gateways.  In fact, it is NOT the general address as such when we are 
>talking about clusters, but actually the IP address used in the Cluster 
>Members entry over which the management server will connect to the individual 
>member.
>
>So, convention suggests that the cluster object GENERAL address is the cluster
>(Virtual) address of the EXTERNAL interface.  The CLUSTER MEMBERS are each 
>defined using an IP address reachable by the management server, and the 
>contents of the TOPOLOGY table is the physically present addressing for each 
>member gateway and the Virtual IP for the cluster shared interface for each 
>physical network.
>
>In your case, it is the IP address for the CLUSTER MEMBERS that will be the 
>20.20.20.x address "seen" by the management server, but this address should 
>NOT appear in the TOPOLOGY tab interface lists.  The antispoofing 
>configuration for the real 10.10.10.x addresses on the managed interface will 
>need to include the NAT'd address of the management server (as seen by the 
>firewalls), as well as any other networks that arrive via that interface (and 
>should therefore be a group object containing the management server address, 
>the local interface network object and then any other reachable nets).
>
>I recommend that you draw yourself two diagrams.  On the first, label every 
>interface subnet around the cluster with it's network and subnet mask, and the 
>physical and virtual addresses assigned to each interface on each firewall.  
>
>Label the management server with the IP address that it will have when the 
>packets have been NAT'd and arriving at the firewall.  On the second, label 
>the interfaces and management server as the management server sees things - 
>real physical IP address of the management server, the NAT'd IP addresses of 
>the two firewall interfaces that you'll be managing the firewalls from, as 
>well as the physical addresses of the firewall interfaces (and their VIPs).  
>These two separate diagrams should help you understand clearly how the traffic 
>will be looking at each side of the NAT boundary and what that means in terms 
>of objects etc.
>
>Finally, DO consider relocating the management server logically (or 
>physically) in the network.  NAT'd gui client connections are MUCH easier to 
>cope with than NAT'd management connections between SmartCenter and Firewalls. 
> (You can use tunnelled connections over SSH to run the GUI clients for 
>example and NEVER even think about the NAT involved or indeed maintaining GUI 
>client lists on the management server).
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>Steve
>Mob:   +44 7766 704871
>
>Security is a process, not a product !
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Addy
>Sent: 22 June 2011 12:16
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Please help!!! " Reason: Smart Center Server aborted 
>connection with peer, due to timeout = 300000( mili-sec )( port = 18191 )
>
>Stephen,
>
>The firewalls themselves are on a 10.10.10.2 and 10.10.10.3 and cluster IP is
>10.10.10.1
>
>
>We cannot target the 10. but our 10.x gets nat'd enroute to a 20.20.20 where 
>the 
>
>
>firewalls then see it as a 10.x so i was thinking the main ip and topology 
>needs 
>
>
>to be changed on the firewall object from a 10.x to a 20.x and was thinking 
>should i leave the 10.x in place on the object and simply change this to the 
>20.x or create another dummy 20.x as main ip and topo, and leave the current
>10.10.10.1 in the topo but not as main ip, 
>
>
>cheers
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Stephen JT Bourike <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Wed, 22 June, 2011 11:43:40
>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Please help!!! " Reason: Smart Center Server aborted 
>connection with peer, due to timeout = 300000( mili-sec )( port = 18191 )
>
>Peter,
>
>The cluster topology is ONLY the physical (and VIP) configuration of the 
>cluster 
>
>
>members, it has no relationship at all to how it is managed.  You should not 
>be changing anything about the cluster 
>
>
>The anti-spoofing configuration for the interface that the management traffic 
>comes through may need some changes if your management server is being NAT'd, 
>to 
>
>
>ensure that traffic to/from the management server isn't seen as spoofed.
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>Steve
>Security is a process, not a product.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Addy
>Sent: 20 June 2011 17:30
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Please help!!! " Reason: Smart Center Server aborted 
>connection with peer, due to timeout = 300000( mili-sec )( port = 18191 )
>
>Also what are your thoughts on the cluster that will be managed by the smart 
>center, what I mean is it best practice that when changing the cluster ip and 
>topo interfaces to the nat ip you would manage this on and still add back in 
>the 
>
>
>real and what was the cluster 10.x  on the topo and rename the interface name 
>different is to say eth1-s1pc0  or is this not relevant?
>
>On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:25 BST Stephen JT Bourike wrote:
>
>>Peter,
>>
>>If the NAT is occurring naturally (ie on a non-Check Point device en-route) 
>>then 
>>
>>
>>no - but you DO need to make sure that you are NOT accidentally applying NAT 
>>rules on that gateway that could affect things.
>>
>>More likely is probably the anti-spoofing applied to the interface that the 
>>management connection is arriving on - zdebug will probably help you 
>>determine 
>>that. 
>>
>>
>>Is your source address (ie the management server) getting NAT'd ?  If it is, 
>>then this is going to get messy, especially if that SmartCenter manages more 
>>than this one gateway pair.    The firewall will assume that it's management 
>>server is on the IP address that is shown in the General IP address on the 
>>SmartCenter object.  Until you install policy, the firewalls will accept 
>>control 
>>
>>
>>from ANY  management server with a valid SIC, but once you push the policy 
>>down, 
>>
>>
>>part of the information handed to the firewalls is the specific IP addresses 
>>of 
>
>
>>the management and log servers.
>>
>>What this would mean  is that if your management server is on 10.10.10.10 
>>physically, but the en-route NAT changes this to 20.20.20.20, the GENERAL IP 
>>address of the management server will need to be configured as 20.20.20.20 in 
>>order for it to work properly.  If, however, you have a second pair of 
>>firewalls 
>>
>>
>>that see the management server properly as it's un-NAT'd address 
>>(10.10.10.10) 
>>then you will have issues if you start changing the General IP address.
>>
>>If you are using SmartCenter, you should be able to open the topology 
>>tab of the management server object and create one entry for the real 
>>IP address (eth0 - 10.10.10.10) and then a second entry (eth1 - 
>>20.20.20.20).  Depending on the version (and this really does behave 
>>differently in different releases), you should then be able to push 
>>policy and the gateway will accept connections from either IP address. 
>>If this is the only gateway you are managing, you can then set the 
>>General IP address to the 20.20.20.20 NAT address and job done.  If you 
>>have other gateways too then you probably cannot change the general 
>>address, so you may continue to see logging issues because the firewall 
>>will continue to try to log to the address in the General tab.  You may 
>>be able to overcome this using something as simple as a forced static 
>>host route for the general IP address via the NATting router, or you 
>>may need to create a separate "dummy" log server object and use
>that instead of the Sma!
>> rtCenter in the logs and masters section as the log server of choice.
>>
>>Or you can work out a way to eliminate the need for NAT in the first 
>>place (like moving the Smart Centre to another place in the network) :)
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>
>>Steve
>>Security is a process, not a product.
>> 
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 
>>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter 
>>Addy
>>Sent: 20 June 2011 09:22
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Please help!!! " Reason: Smart Center Server 
>>aborted connection with peer, due to timeout = 300000( mili-sec )( port 
>>= 18191 )
>>
>>Thanks, appreciate the detailed reply.
>>The firewalls are currently managed by a P-1 but will be managed from a smart 
>>center, if the nat occurs naturally and back then do we still need to have 
>>nat 
>>rules applied, any idea how the nat rules will read?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>>=================================================
>>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages, send an email to 
>>[email protected]
>>in the BODY of the email add:
>>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>>=================================================
>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>>please see the instructions at
>>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>>=================================================
>>If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, 
>>email [email protected] 
>>=================================================
>
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages, send an email to 
>[email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email 
>[email protected] =================================================
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>send an email to [email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your
>subscription options, email
>[email protected]
>=================================================
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>send an email to [email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your
>subscription options, email
>[email protected]
>=================================================
>
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>send an email to [email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your
>subscription options, email
>[email protected]
>=================================================
>
>
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>send an email to [email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your
>subscription options, email
>[email protected]
>=================================================
>
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>send an email to [email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your
>subscription options, email
>[email protected]
>=================================================
>
>
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>send an email to [email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your
>subscription options, email
>[email protected]
>=================================================
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>
>Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>send an email to [email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your
>subscription options, email
>[email protected]
>=================================================


Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================

Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

Reply via email to