What do you mean exactly? Can't you be more specific? I have used FW-1 with
6 NIC's and i had no problems. Have you checked the Anti-spoofing rules? Are
you using local.arp file? Are you using routing through your External router
to pass the traffic? Can you ping all the NIC's? Is there a routing problem
with your NT? Have you used more than 1 default gateway (you shouldn't
have)? Please be more specific.

-----Original Message-----
From: Linder, Gary W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW-1] Multiple NICs on NT


I am running FW-1 v4.1/sp5 on NT v4/sp6a+299444 with multiple NICs.  I have
ran successfully with three NICs but when I add the fourth traffic from my
external addresses no longer is "passed"/NAT to the internal address.

Has anyone successfully added 4 NICs to NT?

Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.



Gary

Gary Linder

Direct phone:  (402) 563-5350
E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================

=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================

Reply via email to