Well, I suspect you will get a veritable flood of replies on this one :-) The two HA solutions with FW-1 that I have experience with are Stonebeat Full cluster and the Nokia solution.
The stonebeat setup I worked with used sun E250 enforcement servers with gig E interfaces and a ultra 10 for a management server I've done numerous setups with nokia boxes using IP 330's and 440's with a variety of interfaces. The stonbeat was a pain in the a$$, and product support seemed more interested in deflecting blame and making excuses than working the problems. I walked away with a bad taste in my mouth. The Nokia solution works beautifully. very easy to configure, maintain, and administer. Only drawback is failover can take a couple of seconds. If you require subsecond failover, it's not a good choice. I cannot comment on rainwall or other solutions, as I have not implemnented and/or supported them. Have a good one. Steven McNutt, CCIE #6495, CCSE #6224, MCSE President LightningCloud Technologies bus: 904-241-0064 cel: 904-386-3880 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Arvanitis, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FW-1] High Availability I am looking at a clustering or load balancing solution for my environment. Does anybody have any suggestions on what I should look at? I am presently looking at RainWall and Checkpoints High Availability module. Thanks Steve ================================================= To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the BODY of the email add: set fw-1-mailinglist nomail ================================================= To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================= If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] =================================================
