The Nortel product is called Contivity, so I'd search on that word if I
were you...
Erik Goldoff
Systems Manager
The HoneyBaked Ham Company
678-966-3320
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Washington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FW-1]I have yet to hear of an IPSec-based VPN that gives a hoot whose product is on each end. Granted, vendor quirkiness can make getting these things to talk a bit tricky, but that makes it sometimes 'a pain,' not 'impossible.'And if we are talking FW-1 to FW-1 here... ok, I'll admit, I haven't touched a Nortel yet, saying that that fundamentally 'won't work' sounds like a bit of a stretch. A quick call to Checkpoint should put that to rest.-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Carrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW-1]Hi there,
We're currently in the throws of implementing FW-1, however, our web site is hosted by our MSP and we wanted to set up a permanent VPN to them (firewall to firewall VPN).
Our MSP uses a Nortel 'hardware box' and we want to use FW-1 on an Intel server. Our MSP insists that FW-1 > Nortel VPNs won't work, even though I'm under the impression that nortel firewalls use FW-1!!
Can anyone verify this? If this is the case, can anyone suggest away of keeping our intel server and still creating a VPN with the MSP?
If this is proven TO WORK can someone send me some supporting docs?
Cheers,
Stuart C
Screwfix Direct
intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)
