The
Contivity switches have a "branch tunnel" option. We have a couple of
Checkpoint fw's and a couple of Contivity switches, but we aren't tunnelling
between them as such. It sounds like you're looking at implementing
site-to-site vpn tunnel, so the above option may work for you. As far as I
know, the Contivity units do standard IPsec/IKE, you will probably just
need to experiment with them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Carrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW-1]Hi there,
We're currently in the throws of implementing FW-1, however, our web site is hosted by our MSP and we wanted to set up a permanent VPN to them (firewall to firewall VPN).
Our MSP uses a Nortel 'hardware box' and we want to use FW-1 on an Intel server. Our MSP insists that FW-1 > Nortel VPNs won't work, even though I'm under the impression that nortel firewalls use FW-1!!
Can anyone verify this? If this is the case, can anyone suggest away of keeping our intel server and still creating a VPN with the MSP?
If this is proven TO WORK can someone send me some supporting docs?
Cheers,
Stuart C
Screwfix Direct
intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)
