I agree, putkey sucks.
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Daniel Wirth wrote:
> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 13:19:25 +0200
> From: Daniel Wirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Deane, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'davidxs' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Fw-1-Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: AW: [FW1] Rainwall clustered NT firewalls
>
>
> [...cut...]
>
> > We found Rainwall itself to be extremely easy to set up. The
> > hardest part of
> > the install (for me at least) was getting the FW-1 state
> > synchronization set
> > up properly. I'm not sure, but I don't think that "fw putkey" is the most
> > reliable command FW-1 around. It seems to work sometimes, and not others
> > (but that could just be me.) Anyhow, once that is set up, the actual
> > Rainwall install itself pretty much automated.
>
> just my 2 cents: ;-))
>
> putkey is not unreliably. you just have to remind to issue the putkeys
> commands on both ends of the tunnel within a few minutes.
> Daniel Wirth
> Consultant Network Security
> _____________________________________________________
> Daniel Wirth Systemberater Netzwerksicherheit
> IQproducts GmbH Max-Planck-Str. 5, 80609 Dornach
> Tel.: ++49 89 944940-0 Fax.: ++49 89 944940-50
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iqproducts.de
> _____________________________________________________
> Bitte beachten Sie fuer Ihre Supportanfragen:
> Tel.: ++49 89 944940-77 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
>
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
