I finally got it working.. Wish I could tell you how. I'm using
2.2.15.. 2.2.13, what they recommend, wasn't stable. 

I have scsi on board, but no scsi devices.. I left it enabled in the
kernel, since it always seemed to break without it (bizarre?)

SMP machine, its a standard Va reserach full on 2x2.  Dual 550's.. it's
running fine now. 5 Day uptime without crash.

On Tue, 30 May 2000, Martin H Hoz-Salvador wrote:

> 
> Steve Babb wrote:
> > 
> > I am sure it is a great product, but am just really frustrated with the
> > Linux version. I now have it running happily under NT and will see how that
> > goes..
> > I would be interested in running under solaris. I can't buy an Ultra, my
> > boss has a tight wallet :-) I would however be interested in running it on
> > solaris x86. Have you had any experience running it under solaris is intel
> > with regard to stability?
> 
> 
> Running under Solaris is very stable. I've running some boxes with
> FW-1 4.0 and Solaris 2.6 and they've uptimes about 100 days or more.
> 
> Now, I'm just trying to setup (today) three Linux boxes with FW-1 and 
> get the same error "Aiee, killing interrupt handler Kernel... blah, blah..."
> 
> My hardware is two Pentium III, one Pentium II, 128 Mb RAM, IDE disks,
> and Kingston PCI NIC's... RedHat 6.1 and kernel 2.2.12 
> 
> I'm no lucky today. Someone has running FW1 with Linux? I'm really in 
> doubt with this...  :-P
> 
> Regards.
> 
> -- M. Hoz
> 
> 
> ================================================================================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
> 



Erik Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to