We're running Stonebeat here. I have 2 Sun Ultra Enterprise 250 servers each running FireWall-1 console and Stonebeat console, and another Sun Ultra Enterprise 250 running FireWall Management Station and Stonebeat Management station. We run them in HA mode as opposed to load balance, though eventually we may go to load balance. I have had several instances where a failure on our primary firewall would immediately force the secondary to take over. In 99.9 percent of this happening, there is absolutely no disruption to our users with the exception of those who may have been performing an FTP session. They would then have to re-connect, but it is inobtrusive to our users. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We're thinking about implementing the High Availibility option under > Firewall-1 ver 4.1 but I've been hearing that it's not very stable and that > Stonebeat would be a better choice for HA as well as load balacing. Any > comments? > > Damir Matanic > > ================================================================================ > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ================================================================================ Best regards, -- Layne Meier Network/Internet Analyst The Atlanta Journal-Constitution A Cox Newspaper
begin:vcard n:Meier;Layne tel;pager:(888) 548-9571 tel;fax:(404) 526-5167 tel;work:(404) 526-7180 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ajc.com org:Atlanta Journal-Constitution;Information Technology version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network/Internet Analyst adr;quoted-printable:;;72 Marietta Street, NW=0D=0A4th Floor - I.T.;Atlanta;GA;30303-2899;USA x-mozilla-cpt:;3 fn:Layne Meier end:vcard
