By the way, checkpoint asked me why use RADIUS instead of the ACE server option?  I
ended up switching to ACE server.

Steve

"Martin, Andy" wrote:

> Hiya,
>
> I am running Checkpoint Firewall-1 SP6 VPN-DES on windows NT 4 Server SP6a.
> The problem I am experiencing is as follows.
>
> I am trying to use Radius authentication with the radius server that ships
> with ACE (Secure ID), I have deined my server object, and the users etc,
> whenever I try to authenticate with the user I have created an I assume the
> Firewall attempts communication with the Radius server for the password
> (i.e. the pin number and current displayed number on the Secure ID token) I
> get a DR Watsons error and the authentication just hangs. The Dr Watsons
> error is and Access Violation c0000005 and indicates the fw.exe as the cause
> of the problem.
>
> Has anyone out there experienced this problem before or if checkpoint is
> listening in is this a known bug and if so how do we fix it.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the sender immediately.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for
> the presence of computer viruses.
> **********************************************************************
>
> ================================================================================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to