Depends on your throughput per interface.  I've got Sun E250's with a
single 400Mhz CPU with 13 100Mbps interfaces (max you can get on this box)
and it works fine.  However I'm under 50Mbps total for all the interfaces.
If you want a lot of total throughput, you better look into some kind of
software load balancing (Rainfinity or Stonesoft) since hardware
solutions are going to be really really expensive for that many
interfaces.

-- 
Aaron Turner        [EMAIL PROTECTED]  650.237.0300 x252
Security Engineer                         Vicinity Corp.        
Cell: 408-314-9874                        http://www.vicinity.com

On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, erica bernt wrote:

> 
> Hello All,
> 
> We have just finished a design review for a HA FW1 in
> our medium sized financial institution. We end up with
> 10 separate segments including financial lan, office
> lan, remote access, internet, web, financial flows,
> special high security systems etc... 
> 
> My question is whether anyone has experience of this
> kind of Firewall configuration ? Is it realistic
> ?would the rules management be an issue with so many
> segments. Are there any other alternative approaches
> that we should consider ?
> 
> Is this type of firewall config becoming the norm or
> are we creating a monster ?
> 
> Any feedback would be most welcome. thanks Erica
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
> http://invites.yahoo.com/
> 
> 
> ================================================================================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
> 



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to