Hi,

Few months ago, I created two IDS rules following
Lance's article "Intrusion Detection for FW-1", they
all worked fine and caught few suspicious activity,
additionally, a month ago I decided to tune up the
system a li'l bit (Solaris 2.6 patch level 105181-21 ,
FW-1 4.0). I applied some changes:

ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_xmit_hiwat 64000
ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_recv_hiwat 64000
ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_slow_start_initial 2
ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_conn_req_max_q 1024
ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_conn_req_max_q0 4096
ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_close_wait_interval 60000
and set tcp:tcp_conn_hash_size = 16384
 in /etc/system

I also set local-mac-address and put two other entries
to objects.C file:

:nat_limit (50000)
:nat_hashsize (65535)

Since then on I've been getting all kinds of false
alarms, valid outbound http conns get cut off, it also
happens to some smtp (with roughly 12,000 a day 30-40
are cut) as being caught by either rule 1 or 2* 

*(1 - prevents queSO and ping-of-death from the
Internet to DMZ, 2 - prevents portscanning on DMZ) 

Before the change was done all http initiated from
outside (all the banner exchangers) had been just
silently dropped.

I'm kinda confused.. however I suspect it has
something to do with windows and timeouts affecting
long-lasting sessions - i.e. an email with 5mb
attachment)
any advise more than welcome!

ps.
for those who haven't seen it yet, there is an
excellent article on Solaris kernel tupe-up
http://www.rvs.uni-hannover.de/people/voeckler/tune/EN/tune.html

Dominik

=====
Your rifle is only a tool
it is a hard heart which kills..
             <full metal jacket>
--------------------------------
Dominik M. Miklaszewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail � Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to