+1 to this I really do not understand why a simple command like this svn co http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/trunk/library ZendFramework or a svn:externals property like ZendFramework http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/trunk/library seems to be so problematic for you guys...
Le lundi 26 février 2007, Eric Coleman a écrit : > -1 on all accounts, leave it where it is. > > Is it really that difficult to have your 'libs' folder seperated out > by what it is? Mine looks as follows: > > libs/lib-pear > libs/lib-zend > libs/lib-vlx > libs/lib-am > > with lib-zend being svn:externals to a specific revision, and lib- > vlx, and lib-am being pear/zf code standard framework style > components of my own. It works fine, and honestly it's not really > that difficult to deal with. > > On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Shekar C Reddy wrote: > > Shuffling the files one level down - sounds good to me. > > > > On 2/26/07, Tautvydas Andrikys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I think the best solution would be to change naming conventions, > >> so that > >> the main class of a package would be in package directory, like in > >> Java. > >> And as Ralf suggested class Zend could be removed. > >> So: > >> Zend/Db.php => Zend/Db/Db.php, > >> Zend/Db/Table.php => Zend/Db/Table/Table.php > >> ... > >> > >> This way use of one separate framework package would be much > >> easier: it > >> would be enough to copy directory[now we need to copy directory > >> and one > >> .php class file] and there would be much cleaner package separation. > >> > >> Ralf Eggert wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I personally think that the proposed renaming of the Zend class to > >> > Zend_Framework is very misleading. I would expect that a > >> > >> Zend_Framework > >> > >> > class will set up the whole framework and not be just a funny > >> > conglomeration of methods who did not find their way to a proper > >> > >> component. > >> > >> > Here are my suggestions: > >> > > >> > - move Zend::register(), Zend::registry(), Zend::isRegistered(), > >> > Zend::initRegistry() and Zend::__unsetRegistry() to Zend_Registry > >> > > >> > - drop Zend::exception() and Zend::loadInterface() > >> > > >> > - move Zend::loadClass(), Zend::loadFile() and Zend::isReadable > >> > >> () to > >> > >> > a new Zend_Loader class > >> > > >> > - as suggested by others, move Zend::dump() to Zend_Debug > >> > > >> > - the only method I am not sure about yet is Zend::compareVersion > >> > >> () but > >> > >> > I bet we will find a solution for this as well > >> > > >> > Like others I would also suggest to implement these changes > >> > >> before the > >> > >> > 0.9.0 beta release gets launched. > >> > > >> > Best Regards, > >> > > >> > Ralf > >> > >> Tautvydas Andrikys aka esminis -- Olivier Sirven Elma Ingénierie Informatique 3, rue d'Uzès F-75002 - Paris - France http://www.elma.fr Tel: +33-1-44882744 Fax: +33-1-44882747 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
