I totally agree with this, I have been prepared to get in and help but how do I 
know what I can do without interfering with others, and how do I join a team 
etc. It's not entirely clear within the issue tracker.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michał Minicki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 9:51 PM
To: Zend Framework General
Subject: [fw-general] Issue resolving procedure
Importance: High

Hello. I have a question or an idea for improvement when it comes to issue 
resolving procedures.

There are a lot of open issues in the issue tracker and I bet there are a lot 
of ZF devs who, like me, don't know whether they can fix the user submitted 
issue or not.

It's all open source, alright, but you, at Zend, certainly have a vision and 
some standards you try to keep to. So having that in mind, instead of fixing 
bugs I'm hesitating over issues all the time and skipping them if I have any 
doubts. And I'm pretty sure I'm not alone on this :)

Is there some kind of a process in choosing which issues are going to be fixed 
or implemented? I mean, is there someone who scans the issues daily and marks 
them as "won't be done" or "to be done"? If not, maybe it would be a good idea 
to somehow mark the issues for all your devoted developers.

Or maybe there already is some way to make sure that we can take this or that 
issue on ourselves?

-- 
Michał Minicki aka Martel Valgoerad | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
http://aie.pl/martel.asc
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"Idleness is not doing nothing. Idleness is being free to do anything." --
Floyd Dell


Reply via email to