I would greatly appreciate if everyone ignores Greg's value judgments in responding to this mail. After all, he is entitled to his opinion, even if you feel it doesn't align with yours or a substantial set of our list subscribers. :) Greg, once again I respectfully ask you to consider your audience. This list has a long history of productive discussion and next to no flame wars. If you're more interested in conflict than a discussion about ZF, then you are off topic for this list and I would respectfully ask you to take it elsewhere.
Thanks again. ,Wil > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Uri > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Josh Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the idea > > I have a clear understanding of what a framework is for, thanks. > > > with any large framework > > ZF is not large by any stretch of the imagination, especially when you > discount the useless parts. > > > is to replace code replication all > > over the place the "many serious web developers already have" into > one, > > coherent, reusable & maybe integrated code piece with the framework. > > It's an edge case at best, a 30 second task for Google, or a 10 second > task to copy and pasting from an existing code base. Regular > expressions for URL validation are not in short supply. > > And then recognize the fact that Zend_Uri isn't aware of anything in > the Zend_Route* stuff, so where is the reuse exactly? Do they think > we're so incapable that we can't code up a valid URL using an anchor > tag? It's insulting. > > > -- > Greg Donald > http://destiney.com/
