> Again, it's not ZFs responsibility to spell out license restrictions > that may or may not exist for a given service that it provides a client > for.
You make it sound like providing extra and valuable information is a bad thing. I think the more information you provide to the user, the better. At the end of the day, that's what the docblock is for right? On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Bryan Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [fw-general] Web services & licensing issue > From: "Greg Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, May 08, 2008 9:00 am > To: fw-general@lists.zend.com > > On 5/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Personally, I've never been in a position where I didn't check T&C > >> and/or license agreement of a service that I was consuming. I've never > >> simply "assumed" that I could use at will. > > > <tangent> > >Do you also query the webmasters of all publicly available web pages > >you encounter before allowing your browser to render them? > > >A webservice is just a fancy buzzword for "we wrap our content in XML > >for your convenience". If it's not supposed to be public then it > >should require authentication. > </tangent> > > >-- > >Greg Donald > >http://destiney.com/ > > > Again, it's not ZFs responsibility to spell out license restrictions > that may or may not exist for a given service that it provides a client > for. I think providing URLs in the manual and/or the component's > docblock is more than enough, and should be considered a convenience for > the developer. > > >
