-- Georgy Turevich <georgy.turev...@gmail.com> wrote (on Wednesday, 23 September 2009, 10:31 PM +0400): > 2009/9/21 Matthew Weier O'Phinney <matt...@zend.com> > > > > -- Georgy Turevich <georgy.turev...@gmail.com> wrote > > (on Monday, 21 September 2009, 10:02 PM +0400): > > > [skip original message] > > > > Awesome idea. I see two things that would need to happen to make it > > possible: > > > > One, it would need to depend on the View resource being available to > > ensure that a view object is present to be configured. This is trivial > > to enforce, though. > > Of course it need view object. > > > Second, it would be easier to do this if we add a setOptions() method > > that proxies to the setters. Please add an issue for this to the > > tracker, and then a feature request for the Resource -- and make that > > issue depend on the setOptions() issue. > > I create this issues > http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-7938 > http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-7939
Awesome, thanks! -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Project Lead | matt...@zend.com Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
