roland wrote: > > Offtopic; > Was jQuery a well-thought-out descision in the first place? I personally > favor PrototypeJS - it's more in line with ZF/OOP - but that's a non-issue > if a Zend_Js_Framework interface becomes available :') > Most certainly off-topic; however, if we were to debate JS library virtues, I'd personally favor PrototypeJs to be at the bottom of the "good" virtues list given it modifies built-in object prototypes. Not a good citizen IMHO.
----- -- Wil Moore III Best Practices for Working with Open-Source Developers http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch19s02.html Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting: http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html DO NOT TOP-POST and DO trim your replies: http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#toppost -- View this message in context: http://zend-framework-community.634137.n4.nabble.com/Discontinuing-Maintenance-of-ZendX-JQuery-Suggest-drop-for-2-0-tp3221856p3636450.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- List: fw-general@lists.zend.com Info: http://framework.zend.com/archives Unsubscribe: fw-general-unsubscr...@lists.zend.com