roland wrote:
> 
> Offtopic;
> Was jQuery a well-thought-out descision in the first place? I personally
> favor PrototypeJS - it's more in line with ZF/OOP - but that's a non-issue
> if a Zend_Js_Framework interface becomes available :')
> 
Most certainly off-topic; however, if we were to debate JS library virtues,
I'd personally favor PrototypeJs to be at the bottom of the "good" virtues
list given it modifies built-in object prototypes. Not a good citizen IMHO.

-----
--
Wil Moore III

Best Practices for Working with Open-Source Developers
http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch19s02.html

Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting:
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html

DO NOT TOP-POST and DO trim your replies:
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#toppost
--
View this message in context: 
http://zend-framework-community.634137.n4.nabble.com/Discontinuing-Maintenance-of-ZendX-JQuery-Suggest-drop-for-2-0-tp3221856p3636450.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
List: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Info: http://framework.zend.com/archives
Unsubscribe: fw-general-unsubscr...@lists.zend.com


Reply via email to