J. Bakshi wrote:
> [.........]
>> deb http://dthrepo.podzone.org/debian/ lenny main
>> deb http://dthrepo.podzone.org/debian/ etch main
>>
>> will be removed next week.
>>   
> 
> Is there any special reason to remove those ? 

Bad revision numbers in packages (missing bpo).
Furthermore, packages are backports so I do as backports.org
(distribution name), thus making my life easier to handle
Lenny-backports with Debian tools. For Etch-backports it is a bit trickier.

==================  LENNY-BACKPORTS   ==================
|debian-dthconnex-keyring  | 2008.09.06~bpo50+1        |
|fwknop-client             | 1.9.11-1~bpo50+1          |
|fwknop-server             | 1.9.11-1~bpo50+1          |
|fwsnort                   | 1.0.6-1~bpo50+1           |
|gpgdir                    | 1.9.4-1~bpo50+1           |
|lbm4r                     | 0.4.4-1~bpo50+1           |
|md5deep                   | 3.4-1~bpo50+1             |

==================       LENNY        ==================
|debian-dthconnex-keyring  | 2008.09.06                |
|fwknop-client             | 1.9.10-1~bpo50+1          |
|fwknop-server             | 1.9.10-1~bpo50+1          |

==================   ETCH-BACKPORTS   ==================
|debian-dthconnex-keyring  | 2008.09.06~bpo40+1        |
|fwknop-client             | 1.9.11-1~bpo40+1          |
|fwknop-server             | 1.9.11-1~bpo40+1          |
|fwsnort                   | 1.0.5-2~bpo40+1           |
|gpgdir                    | 1.9.4-1~bpo40+1           |
|libiptables-chainmgr-perl | 0.9-1~bpo40+1             |
|libiptables-parse-perl    | 0.7-1~bpo40+1             |

==================        ETCH        ==================
|debian-dthconnex-keyring  | 2008.09.06                |
|fwknop-client             | 1.9.10-1~bpo40+1          |
|fwknop-server             | 1.9.10-1~bpo40+1          |
|fwsnort                   | 1.0.5-1                   |
|libiptables-chainmgr-perl | 0.8-1                     |
|libiptables-parse-perl    | 0.7-1                     |


> will then all those be in the official repo ?

You mean backports.org?

I have been about to send them to backports.org, but checking for the
pocpon stats (see http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=fwknop for
example) I have prefererd adding them to my own repository.

Regards,

-- 
Franck Joncourt
http://debian.org - http://smhteam.info/wiki/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Fwknop-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwknop-discuss

Reply via email to