On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:51:45PM +0000, Stephen Turner wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Prakash Kailasa wrote: > > > > Stephen's "cheating" works because he is using regexes and the base36 > > values in the test program favored his approach so he could manage > > with single character regexes. > > > > It was not my cheating.
My apologies. It was Paul Johnson's. I misread the attributions in Philippe's earlier message. > I'm still interested in seeing a real solution less than 46. But maybe there > isn't one. I am waiting too. /prakash -- Prakash Kailasa <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> == Though I'll admit readability suffers slightly... -- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ==
