������� Ian Phillipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 at 11:30:17 +0200, Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski
> wrote:
> >
> > hi!
> >
> > I hope I understand the problem correctly, i.e. `how to escape'?
> >
> > In this case I always prefer:
> >
> > our %ESCMAP = ();
> > for ( 0 .. 255 ) { $ESCMAP{ chr( $_ ) } = sprintf("%%%02X", $_); }
>
> That's not enough fun:
>
> our %ESCMAP = map { chr($_) => sprintf "%%%02X",$_ } 0..255;
>
> :-)
define 'fun' please :)))
>
> > I did few benchmarks. The results were:
> > (for 1_000_000 iterations over ~20 char string)
>
> Hmm.. this will depend heavily on the number of escapees in the string.
> If you're expecting hardly any, then the best algorithm may be
> different
> dealing with running text in non-Latin script, where every char will
> match.
>
> Every now and then, I get this sneaking feeling that I ought to write a
> generalised "pack" that can do this sort of thing. But usually the
> feeling passes.
>
> Ian
>
there are no fair benchmark :) anyway I think my benchmark is correct as
long as I set all the functions (being tested) in the same situations
(same input, same iterations count and expecting same correct result)
finally I cannot benchmark the world (i.e. everything) ;)
P! Vladi.
--
Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.biscom.net/~cade http://cade.webbg.com
____________________________________________________
����� � ������� � ��������? - http://reklama.mail.bg
