On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 06:34 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Werner,
> 
> there was a check-in yesterday from Sam

Actually this one happened a while ago. I was trying to be compliant to
WS-I BSP section 8.3.1. I guess we may need a flag to turn this off?

/Sam

> -- dims
> 
> 
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:30:56 +0100, Dittmann Werner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yves,
> > 
> > as far as I know we didn't change WSS4J in this respect,
> > at least I can't remember any JIRA issue that would have
> > caused such a change. Maybe it is the new version of
> > the xmlsec library? Usually dims updates the WSS4J cvs
> > with the latest version of the xmlsec lib. Can you
> > check this (by using an older xmlsec lib)?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Werner
> > 
> > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Yves Langisch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. M�rz 2005 12:21
> > > An: [email protected]
> > > Betreff: WSS4J interop issue
> > >
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > We have a .NET client which is able to consume signed
> > > messages from our
> > > Axis/WSS4J web service. We just put a newer version from the WSS4J
> > > library to our web service and now .NET is not able anymore to consume
> > > the signed messages.
> > >
> > > After some digging I found out that the only difference is the new
> > > InclusiveNamespaces-element in each Transform-element. .NET
> > > doesn't seem
> > > to be able to process this additional setting for the canonicalization
> > > algorithm correctly. Or WSS4J is doing something wrong here.
> > >
> > > Used versions:
> > >
> > > client: WSE 2.0 SP1/SP2/SP3
> > > server: Axis 1.2RC3, WSS4J (cvs from 20041122)
> > > --> works fine
> > >
> > > client: WSE 2.0 SP1/SP2/SP3
> > > server: Axis 1.2RC3, WSS4J (actual cvs build)
> > > --> doesn't work
> > >
> > > Any hints on this?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Yves
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
-- 
Sam Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago
630-252-1752


Reply via email to