hmmm, 

does WS-I BSP is inline with OASIS WSS? In other word, does
WS-I BSP compliance conflicts with OASIS WSS somehow (I'm not
so familiar with WS-I BSP). 

Maybe, as Sam suggests, we can have some sort of
parameter (in the deployment descriptors?) that enables/disables
WS-I compliancy? Probably default should be 
"no WS-I compliancy" :-) because .NET seems to have probs with
it ?

Regards,
Werner

> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Samuel Meder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. M�rz 2005 12:43
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dittmann Werner; Yves Langisch; fx-dev
> Betreff: Re: WSS4J interop issue
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 06:34 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Werner,
> > 
> > there was a check-in yesterday from Sam
> 
> Actually this one happened a while ago. I was trying to be 
> compliant to
> WS-I BSP section 8.3.1. I guess we may need a flag to turn this off?
> 
> /Sam
> 
> > -- dims
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:30:56 +0100, Dittmann Werner
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yves,
> > > 
> > > as far as I know we didn't change WSS4J in this respect,
> > > at least I can't remember any JIRA issue that would have
> > > caused such a change. Maybe it is the new version of
> > > the xmlsec library? Usually dims updates the WSS4J cvs
> > > with the latest version of the xmlsec lib. Can you
> > > check this (by using an older xmlsec lib)?
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Werner
> > > 
> > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: Yves Langisch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. M�rz 2005 12:21
> > > > An: [email protected]
> > > > Betreff: WSS4J interop issue
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > We have a .NET client which is able to consume signed
> > > > messages from our
> > > > Axis/WSS4J web service. We just put a newer version 
> from the WSS4J
> > > > library to our web service and now .NET is not able 
> anymore to consume
> > > > the signed messages.
> > > >
> > > > After some digging I found out that the only difference 
> is the new
> > > > InclusiveNamespaces-element in each Transform-element. .NET
> > > > doesn't seem
> > > > to be able to process this additional setting for the 
> canonicalization
> > > > algorithm correctly. Or WSS4J is doing something wrong here.
> > > >
> > > > Used versions:
> > > >
> > > > client: WSE 2.0 SP1/SP2/SP3
> > > > server: Axis 1.2RC3, WSS4J (cvs from 20041122)
> > > > --> works fine
> > > >
> > > > client: WSE 2.0 SP1/SP2/SP3
> > > > server: Axis 1.2RC3, WSS4J (actual cvs build)
> > > > --> doesn't work
> > > >
> > > > Any hints on this?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Yves
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> Sam Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago
> 630-252-1752
> 
> 

Reply via email to