Dierk, the word in the text I cited, the new book by Y.H., page 161, note 222, is indeed "refuted." S. Goranson
Quoting Dierk van den Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Even more worse, for Zangenberg was indeed meant. > > Hirschfeld_ QUMRAN IN THE SECOND TEMPLE PERIOD, Reassessing the > Archaeological Evidence, LA 52 (202), p 277 # 92. > "Zias (2000) claims that the graves in the southernmost extension that have > an east-west orientation are recent Bedouin graves. Zangenberg (2000b) > refutes his claims one by one." > No past tense (refuted) as Stephen argued, but an ongoing and apparently not > yet finished process of refutation of Zias by Zangenberg is meant. > Roehrer-Ertl & Rohrhirsch (2001) run parallel to this. _______________________________________________ g-Megillot mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot
