Well, Stephen, then Zangenberg has already done with Zias in the meantime. I've thought the battle would last somewhat longer - what a bummer!
_Dierk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Goranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dierk van den Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:03 PM Subject: Re: [Megillot] Qumran history (brief replies To R. Gmirkin) > Dierk, the word in the text I cited, the new book by Y.H., page 161, note 222, > is indeed "refuted." > S. Goranson > > Quoting Dierk van den Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Even more worse, for Zangenberg was indeed meant. > > > > Hirschfeld_ QUMRAN IN THE SECOND TEMPLE PERIOD, Reassessing the > > Archaeological Evidence, LA 52 (202), p 277 # 92. > > "Zias (2000) claims that the graves in the southernmost extension that have > > an east-west orientation are recent Bedouin graves. Zangenberg (2000b) > > refutes his claims one by one." > > No past tense (refuted) as Stephen argued, but an ongoing and apparently not > > yet finished process of refutation of Zias by Zangenberg is meant. > > Roehrer-Ertl & Rohrhirsch (2001) run parallel to this. > > > > _Dierk > > _______________________________________________ g-Megillot mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot
