I hope others realize how humorous this Product M and H discussion is :P On Jun 16, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Chance Reecher wrote:
> Peter Haas wrote: >> >> On Jun 15, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio wrote: >> >>> All in all continuing to make the " H" word we cannot use here more and >>> more attractive. >> >> There's a place for both. >> >> Where absolute compatibility is required, over a great many applications, >> irrespective of performance, I use "Product M". >> >> Where highest performance is required, over comparatively few applications, >> most of these being "mission specific" and "mission critical", I use >> "Product H". >> >> > I find both "H" and "M" very attractive. > > In the portable realm, I greatly prefer "Product M," due in part to the > unmatched hardware design and the fact that I can rely on it to "just work." > However, in the desktop realm, "Product H" is a much better option both in > price and performance. > > My current "H," which is over a year old, cost me less than what the current > Mini would, and is still a superior machine. > > -- > You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for > those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power > Macs. > The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette > guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml > To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
