On Jan 28, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
On Jan 28, 2011, at 12:49 AM, James Therrault wrote:
That's what I suspected.
I think that a 27" might be a limiting factor but still, it would
provide a good deal more real estate...
Remember, it's pixels that count, not physical size. You can buy a
gigantic 52" HDTV and only have a resolution of 1920x1080, and
right now, the smallest 1920x1080 screen I'm aware of comes on a
16" laptop display, and that's still not as high a pixel density as
the iPhone 4's "retinal" display which is the current "record
holder". The new iPad2 is supposed to be 2560x1920 which will
quadruple the pixel count of the current iPad's 1280x960. The iPad2
should be another fantastic product I suspect.
Just an update... I'm new at this big screen high resolution stuff
but evidently, dual-link capability is required to achieve maximum
results. Looking at the price of these displays, I will admit that
they are out of my price range right now.
So, I'm just gonna do with what I got for now...
JT
____________________________________________________________
Globe Life Insurance
$1* Buys $50,000 Life Insurance. Adults or Children. No Medical Exam.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/4d436f80de17fc3af7st02duc
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list