> Question: Why did Apple remove Classic support from Mac OS X 10.5? The two > architectures (PowerPC and Intel) are different anyway:
I fully agree that dropping Classic in Leopard was absolutely arbitrary on Apple's part. In fairness, Classic requires significant hacks to the kernel and low-level operating system and these may not have been UNIX 03 compliant, but the PowerPC version of Leopard isn't technically anyway even without Classic (only the Intel version), and your other disparities are spot-on. But it's water under the bridge now. -- ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com -- This message will self-destruct in five seconds. Good luck, Jim. -- M:I ---- -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
