Jussi Lahtinen ha scritto: > I must add this also... > Profiler is like debugger, if you know where the error is you don't > need debugger, > but many times you don't! > Same thing with profiler, if you know where the bottleneck is you > don't need profiler, > but many times you don't! > I don't know what kind of programs you write, so I can easily go wrong. But... to speak of profiling when using python seems to me a nonsense. I think the following and, I repeat, I could be wrong. You can teach to me.
If a program does networking, database, or uses complex libraries, then the bottleneck is almost always outside the program itself. So it makes little difference in using python, gambas or assembler. If the program does intense computation, then it is a nonsense to use interpreted languages. So I ask again: what kind of program you write? We can take gambas for example. It has wonderful graphics, superb database capabilities, networking libraries and all the rest. For average applications, there is little speed difference between a gambas one and a C++ compiled one. Well. Try to write a CAD program, a word processor (a serious one), a sound or image editor with gambas, and you will find a hard life. The power of todays CPUs hides the burden, but it is still there. So I really don't understand. That's all. Regards, -- Doriano Blengino "Listen twice before you speak. This is why we have two ears, but only one mouth." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
